The UK government has been one of a number around the world which has installed a DNA database which now holds literally millions of DNA samples, both of convicted criminals and those innocent of any crime. There has long been a debate with regards to innocent samples held on the database and accusations of privacy violations with many people not even aware they are on the database!
An enquiry conducted under the watchful eye of the Human Genetics Commission has concluded that all DNA samples from those guilty of no criminal activity should be removed, but interesting they also advise the government that retention of criminal DNA samples may not be ethical. The claim is based on the assumption that criminals who serve their time are affectively being targeted after serving their time, something that will attract a great deal of controversy.
One other issue which has been highlighted by the survey is the deemed lack of security over the database and the growing number of people who have access to the information. Civil liberty groups claim this alleged low level of security could put anyone in the database in danger of wrongful conviction or other similar situations. There are arguments on both sides but which ones hold most strength? |
|
Reader Comments: 0
